This post was originally going to be part of an upcoming post, but since it references current events I wanted to get it out before it became really outdated. Enjoy!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introduction
One of the organisers of NOWSA 2014 bragged about making it “the most intersectional one yet”, what I assume the organiser meant is that the conference featured more non-whites and transgender organisers/speakers and involved discussions of race, disability and just about everything except for the problems that women face as a result of being women. Liberals claim that they (unlike all those nasty anti-pornography, anti-BDSM, “white” feminists) are the true opponents of racism and what they term “ethnocentrism”. They argue for something called “cultural relativism”, the notion that all cultural practices ought to be “respected” (which really means that they ought to be blindly praised and never criticised, no matter how much harm they cause to women.)
Introduction
One of the organisers of NOWSA 2014 bragged about making it “the most intersectional one yet”, what I assume the organiser meant is that the conference featured more non-whites and transgender organisers/speakers and involved discussions of race, disability and just about everything except for the problems that women face as a result of being women. Liberals claim that they (unlike all those nasty anti-pornography, anti-BDSM, “white” feminists) are the true opponents of racism and what they term “ethnocentrism”. They argue for something called “cultural relativism”, the notion that all cultural practices ought to be “respected” (which really means that they ought to be blindly praised and never criticised, no matter how much harm they cause to women.)
As the title
implies, my aim in this article is to convince you that cultural relativism is
in fact a racist, pro-West viewpoint. This post builds upon an idea that I
brought up in the comment section of this article. My next article will also be
based on it. Feel free to check it out before you continue reading and I should
probably give Heretic some credit for mentioning that non-Westerns generally
are not big fans of the sex industry and the “sex-positivity” that goes along
with it.
1. It Makes Non-White People Seem Like Aliens
Liberals
promote the view that nobody who has grown up in the West can ever hope to
understand a non-Western culture, at least not without studying it at
university for years and giving up thousands of dollars in the process, how convenient,
right?
While there are indeed a wide variety of cultures in the world, there are certain patterns as well. The oppression of women is one. Most class-divided societies have some kind of mechanism through which to oppress women. Often this takes the form of a beauty practice like foot-binding or neck rings (which deform women’s collarbones in order to make their necks appear longer) or breast implants or any of the other hundred or so beauty practices that are promoted in the West. Perhaps we are not that different after all.
Class-divided cultures tend to have supernatural and pseudoscientific beliefs
that justify the division of humanity into classes. Judaism, Christianity and Islam claim that there exists a single god who commands the existence of a
hierarchical society in which some people are enslaved to others. Hinduism and Buddhism claim that the world is a place of punishment that people are sent
to (through reincarnation) if they fail to reach Nirvana and thus making life
better for the poor and oppressed would defeat the whole purpose of their existence
on Earth. Then you have the so-called “scientists” who argued
that black people’s brains were naturally smaller than white people’s and that blacks
were thus suited to the role of being slaves. While ruling classes have used all kinds of
different ideological mechanisms to keep the oppressed in their place (thus
creating that “cultural diversity” thing liberals are so fond of) all cultures
which are the product of an economic system that divides people into classes are fundamentally about the
same thing, maintaining that class division.
Cultural
relativists ignore these patterns in favour of a narrative that makes non-Western
cultures seem so different to the culture of the West that those who belong to
the former might as well be aliens. Of course they do not call them aliens, but
they do go out of their way to emphasise how different non-whites are to white
people and how incapable whites are of understanding non-white people. They also denounce
any attempt to point out the similarities between people of different ethnic backgrounds. In doing so, cultural
relativists set up a false contrast between the cultures in which women are
oppressed by various traditional beauty practices and the Western world in
which women are supposedly treated like equals. Then they attack Westerners for
wanting to impose their “egalitarianism” onto other cultures which refuse to
accept the “Western” notion that women ought to be treated like equals. This
whole narrative is of course dependent on the (false) assumption that the West does not
do the oppressive things that non-Western societies do. So tell me, who are the
racists now?
2. It Makes Non-White Groups Seem Internally Homogenous
If the argument
I put forward above is correct, it follows from this that all cultures ought to
be subject to political critique. While it is clear that white people are capable
of critiquing the cultures they grew up in and being part of movements that
challenge Western cultural practices, cultural relativists assume that all
non-whites are blind followers of their cultures. Thus criticising a non-white
person’s culture is deemed to be highly offensive, because there is absolutely
no way that they could be criticising it themselves, right? Non-whites are too
dumb for that.
In case I
did not make myself clear enough, that last comment was sarcastic. Non-whites are in
fact capable of critiquing the cultures they grew up in, just as white people do.
Hence there are radical leftist movements all over the world as well as
secularist and moderate religious movements that seek to combat Muslim extremism. There are even
feminist movements that fight against the enforcement of harmful cultural
practices such as burqa-wearing and female genital mutilation. Cultural
relativists ignore the existence of such movements and instead assume that
every racial group has some kind of uniform culture that had existed for
thousands of years before white people came along and messed things up. White
people (or rather, a group of rich, powerful men who claim to speak up on
behalf of ordinary white people and sometimes enlist their help in order to
impose oppression) have messed things up for non-whites, but not in the way
liberals think they have. I will have more to say about that in the next
section.
3. It Ignores The Role Of The West In International Affairs
In order to
defend practices such as burqa-wearing and female genital mutilation, cultural relativists represent such practices as a natural part of
non-Western cultures. Cultural relativists would have us all believe that Arab
women have been wearing burqas since the beginning of time. In reality, the
Arab world was once the site of intellectual progress and religious
tolerance, at least compared to medieval Europe (in which strict adherence to Catholicism was insisted upon.) As I said above, class divided
societies tend to have cultures and ideologies that reinforce the status quo
and these cultures ought to be critiqued on that basis. The Arabic world of the
middle ages should not be exempt from such critique, but the religious
extremism and violent misogyny of some Islamic countries in the modern era is
at least in part due to the policies of the West. It is not purely a product of traditional
Arabic or Muslim culture.
A timely
example of this phenomenon is Israel’s recent attack on
Gaza. Over 1800 Palestinians (most of them civilians) have lost their lives during the attack and
many more had their homes destroyed by bombs. Israel’s occupation of Palestine has been
going on since 1967, inspiring much of the contempt for the West that exists
within the Middle East and causing the people of Palestine and the surrounding
Arab nations to turn to Islamic extremists who promise protection from the
influences of the West (which is not to say that anyone struggling to liberate
Palestine is automatically an Islamic extremist.)
Another source of contempt is the understandable disgust many in the Arabic world feel towards Western culture. Traditional religion is seen as a means of maintaining order and morality in a world increasingly dominated by the shallow, amoral thinking of the West, and yes, ironic as it is, the very people who are pushing cultural relativism (liberal feminists) are part of the problem. If a group of Muslim extremists, or perhaps even some more moderate Muslims who have not yet totally bought into Western ideology, were to encounter a group of liberal feminists who insisted on “cultural relativism”, “sexual liberation” and the supposed “right to be sexy” the Muslims would see these liberals as an example of everything that is wrong with the West and, to some extent, they would be right.
Another source of contempt is the understandable disgust many in the Arabic world feel towards Western culture. Traditional religion is seen as a means of maintaining order and morality in a world increasingly dominated by the shallow, amoral thinking of the West, and yes, ironic as it is, the very people who are pushing cultural relativism (liberal feminists) are part of the problem. If a group of Muslim extremists, or perhaps even some more moderate Muslims who have not yet totally bought into Western ideology, were to encounter a group of liberal feminists who insisted on “cultural relativism”, “sexual liberation” and the supposed “right to be sexy” the Muslims would see these liberals as an example of everything that is wrong with the West and, to some extent, they would be right.
There are of
course numerous other causes of the growth of religious fundamentalism in the
Middle East and the conflict between the Arab and Western worlds, including the
fact that the US government provided economic backing to extreme Muslim groups
during their fight against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s,
even though more secular resistance groups existed. If you wish to investigate the issue further, I
am sure you will find plenty of people who know way more about the topic than I
do. Noam Chomsky is the first person who comes to mind. For now, I think my
point has been made. Culture is an ever-changing thing and at this point in
history many harmful changes are being perpetuated by the actions of the West.
While cultural relativists present themselves as critics of the West and
Western centrism, their viewpoint ultimately winds up justifying the harms that
the West causes throughout the world.
Conclusion
I hope I
have convinced you that cultural relativism is actually a racist worldview that
makes the West out to be far better than actually is. Instead of challenging
the conservative view that the West is some sort of beacon of enlightenment for
the rest of the world to follow, cultural relativists instead try to convince
us that there is nothing particularly good about enlightenment and that we only
think it is good because we grew up in the “enlightened” West, thus reinforcing
the view that the West is in fact enlightened. Instead of encouraging us to see
the oppressive nature of our own culture, cultural relativists tell us to be
just as uncritical towards other cultures as we are towards our own, thereby
ensuring that Western culture remains uncriticised. I daresay that it is not
the interests of women or non-Westerns that are being served by this fake and
(ironically) highly westernised, anti-racism.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would like to offer my condolences to the hundreds of Gaza residents who lost family members during the time that I spent writing this article and I would like them to know that the actions of the Israel government do not represent the desires of all ethnic Jews.
This same article has been posted on my other blog, which I do not use as often nowadays. The other blog deals with my non-feminism related views. Feel free to check it out if you have the time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would like to offer my condolences to the hundreds of Gaza residents who lost family members during the time that I spent writing this article and I would like them to know that the actions of the Israel government do not represent the desires of all ethnic Jews.
This same article has been posted on my other blog, which I do not use as often nowadays. The other blog deals with my non-feminism related views. Feel free to check it out if you have the time.